Monday, August 25, 2008

Brown Bio


Here's my bio, a sample of what you want to do on your own blogs:

Carrie Brown is a recent transplant to the land where Elvis lives and the sweet tea flows. She began working as an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Memphis last fall, teaching media writing and mass communication theory and attempting to spit into the ill wind blowing at quality journalism. Her research examines how daily newspapers are adapting to the Internet.

Brown graduated from the University of Missouri with a PhD in journalism. She got her MA in communication from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania and her BA in journalism and conservation biology from the University of Wisconsin, in the state where she was born and raised.

Brown has also spent time slogging away in the newsroom herself, as a reporter for the Eau Claire Leader-Telegram in WI, an intern at the Philadelphia Inquirer, an associate newsletter editor covering Capitol Hill in DC, and most recently, as an assistant city editor at the Columbia Missourian. Brown also managed a training program for the Committee of Concerned Journalists for three years, which took her to newspapers across the United States, both big and small, to talk with newsrooms about how they could best handle the changing economic and technological realities of their business while remaining true to their values.

In her virtually non-existent spare time, she enjoys traveling, reading, running, yoga, and sharing domestic macrobrews with her friends. She lives in East Memphis not far from the university with her fiance, Grant, and her dogs, Sam and Pippi.

2 comments:

KingdomCome said...

Ms. Brown,

I recently read your post in response to a Charles Davis column and, more directly, to those commenting on said column (media responsibility on hate...). While I agree with your general premise and understand your view, I believe you proved within your own post the point many others were trying to make in calling for a more fair-handed approach to reporting. Indeed, there should be no requirement for presenting the other side when there is no justifiable defense; however, these rules cannot be applied selectively and maintain public trust in journalism. If you rush to point out hate in one instance, for example, it would be appropriate to do the same in other instances - if you expect to be judged as having any true convictions on the subject of hate. What the people are sick and tired of are journalists applying selective judgement to identical or similar occurances out of political persuasion. I personally don't particularly like or trust anyone who never argues the other side even slightly - regardless of whether I agree with their politics or not. Any journalist arguing on the subject of hate while ignoring the immeasurable amount of hate which has been spewed for the last 8-12 years by those who are on the collective left I will receive with great skepticism. We should all work together to condemn hate on "our own political sides" -if you will- and both sides. Thank you for your time and attention.

Respectfully,

David Rainwater

KingdomCome said...

Ms. Brown,

Please allow me to offer my apologies. I failed to recognize the subject matter/format of the site where I left my comment to your recent post (re:Charles Davis). I feel posting this comment here to be inappropriate. I do apologize.

Regards,

David Rainwater